Read:
Reflect: Post your response to the prompt below by Monday morning.
As you saw in this week’s reading, Design Thinking is a set of steps used to solve specific problems. How are students taught to solve problems in your classroom or content area, and what parallels might exist between those steps and Design Thinking? How might an understanding of Design Thinking benefit students beyond the school day?
Interact: On Monday, read your colleagues' reflections and respond to at least one other post by sharing a comment, insight, or interesting possibility by next Thursday.
Ashleigh Rocco (TSD) · 181 weeks ago
Katelyn V. (ISD) 12p · 180 weeks ago
MeganMitchellSVSD 14p · 178 weeks ago
Katelyn V. (ISD) 12p · 180 weeks ago
Ashleigh Rocco (TSD) · 178 weeks ago
JanineG (ISD) · 178 weeks ago
JanineG · 179 weeks ago
flaggna 34p · 178 weeks ago
Rachael S (ISD) · 178 weeks ago
Erin K. (TSD) · 178 weeks ago
I appreciate your intentional efforts to center the locus of control on your students in the problem-solving process, rather than presenting solutions for your students' approval or without their input at all. Often, I feel we, as educators, default to solutions we feel are best based on our professional experience in teaching and classroom management. In reality, the best ideas stem from our students themselves. When we provide opportunities for our students to drive the conversation and fully participate in every stage of the Design Thinking process, particularly in the "define" and "ideate" stages, then the solutions we come to are more likely to be accepted and enforced by our students. This minimizes the need to re-teach expectations or to begin the problem-solving process over again. While you guide these conversations, it is your students who ultimately lead themselves to a solution. Likely, these solutions are more effective and realistic than the solutions we develop on our own. Thank you for sharing a primary perspective on Design Thinking in real-time!
Stephen Elms · 178 weeks ago
Erin K. (TSD) · 178 weeks ago
Instances such as these have led me to plan and implement opportunities for intentional teaching around problem-solving with special emphasis on the empathy stage. This has been done in both small groups, with individual students, and in the whole class setting. Throughout their fifth-grade year and beyond, my students benefit from the maturation of their emotion management and capacity to accurately identify and understand the context of difficult situations through the Design Thinking process. By resisting the tendency to default to anger or other less productive methods of crafting solutions, my students become far more flexible thinkers and innovators both inside and outside of the classroom.
flaggna 34p · 178 weeks ago
I let them know that we didn't have time for a game because all of the students needed to take turns using the bathroom. I asked them to solve the problem for me. At first the students said I should just let them know the can't go. They were empathizing with me. I let them know that first graders need to use the bathroom and that it's not healthy to hold it in. The students when back to the drawing board and came up the a new solution. When I pick up students, I should ask if then need to use the bathroom. They can go while I'm picking everyone up and I they will wait for me at the end of the hallway; if they don't have to use the bathroom at that moment, then they have to wait until the end of group. I said that was a better idea. The following small group time, we tested the idea. I only had one student use the restroom and not one student asked asked to use the bathroom during group. They got to play a game and had a great time. At the end of group, we reflected on the solution. Everyone agreed that the solution worked and we should continue. Understanding and using Design Thinking is critical in solving problems. It benefits students beyond the school day, because they just practice, in real time, an effective way to solve a problem. I look forward to continuing this form on problem solving in the future.
MeganMitchellSVSD 14p · 178 weeks ago
Hannah J (ISD) 35p · 178 weeks ago
I agree, a lot of my students were hesitant to "think outside the box" at the beginning of the year. I wonder where this belief of "one solution" stems from? I know often times in math curriculum, students are pushed to solve a problem in a specific way, even in Kindergarten. I am wondering how we can encourage students, at a young age, that they can solve in various ways. I also enjoyed hearing that the Design Thinking process isn't linear and that it offers for various interpretations. By using this process of thinking, it allows for everyone to participate and bring in their own outside knowledge. I am excited to try and push myself and my students, to think about problem solving from an empathetic lens. Thank you for sharing!
Stephen Elms · 178 weeks ago
Rachael S (ISD) · 178 weeks ago
Meg H · 177 weeks ago
Hannah J (ISD) 35p · 178 weeks ago
Danielle S. (SVSD) · 178 weeks ago
Danielle S. (SVSD) · 178 weeks ago
Meg H · 177 weeks ago
It is also a powerful way to look at students behaviors and empathize, respond instead of reacting,
Eric Richards · 176 weeks ago
Eric Richards · 176 weeks ago
One of my favorite problem solving materials I have ever come across is Teacher to Teacher back in my old Federal Way days. It was a fantastic curriculum supplement we got that created innovation and creativity (design thinking). Teachers were shown how to not ever respond to a student with "correct" or "incorrect", but to choose words specifically to push thinking and look for different approaches. This was so ahead of its times and I wish I could find it and bring it back. It would fit in today with our approach of supporting mathematical thinking and how to get kids to look at problems different and understand them better.